Friday 25 April 2008

Too Religious? Or conspiracy?




WATCH THESE CLIPS BEFORE YOU READ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aW2N46vf4Q&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9s1odqQTKyU&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fws4RxWtnOg&feature=related

I think that this subject was one of the most sensitive topics that we have touched upon in our lectures. This is because what people perceive as being too religious, may be seen as racist or judgemental. This is because we all have a freedom of speech and this should be able to be applied to religion. The notion of being too religious promotes issues and concerns with issues concerning the war and terrorism. However, I feel that these are not acts of religion, but of power or by secret services. For example; the idea of the twin towers. I believe that this was conducted by the Americans to unite them as a country and a simple reason for them to go to the East for a “war” when they are really robbing the oil. Is it a coinsitent that 3000 Jews had the day off work?


Claims relating to the hijackers
The BBC and the Daily Telegraph reported on September 23 that some of the people named as the hijackers by the FBI were actually "alive and well".One of them was Waleed al-Shehri, who they said they had found in Casablanca, Morocco. Abdulaziz Al Omari, Saeed Alghamdi, and Khalid al-Midhar, three other hijackers, were all said to be living in the Middle East. On September 19, the FDIC distributed a "special alert" which listed al-Mihdhar as alive (the Justice Department later said this was a typographical error). These reports have led to claims that the names of the hijackers may be incorrect, or that the hijacking scenarios outlined in the 9/11 Commission Report may not be the truth.
A variety of conspiracy theories question the mainstream account of the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States. Many of these allegations state that individuals in the government of the United States knew of the impending attacks and intentionally failed to act on that knowledge. Some go further and state that the attacks were a false flag operation carried out by high-level officials in the U.S. government. The suspected motives were to use the attacks as a pretext to justify overseas wars, to facilitate increased military spending, and to restrict domestic civil liberties.
Many of the theories have been voiced by members of the 9/11 Truth Movement a name adopted by some organizations and individuals who question the mainstream account of the attacks. Some 9/11 Truth Movement members question the accuracy of the mainstream account of the attacks, and they are committed to further investigation while others claim that the collapse of the World Trade Center was the result of a controlled demolition and/or that United Airlines Flight 93 was shot down. Some also contend that a commercial airliner did not crash into the Pentagon; this position is debated within the Truth Movement, many of whom believe that AA Flight 77 did crash there, but that it was allowed to do so via an effective stand down of the military.
Published reports by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology rejected the controlled demolition hypothesis. Final scientific reports by structural engineers regarding the collapse of WTC 7 are still pending. The community of civil engineers generally accepts the mainstream account that the impacts of jets at high speeds in combination with subsequent fires, rather than controlled demolition, led to the collapse of the Twin Towers.

America is a place of independce? The country of freedom?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories

Watch this link….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7cvjBViV7g

No comments: